I understand your frustration, but dismissing the article's perspective and my credibility outright is not constructive. I acknowledge that most mass shooters are young men, but argues that focusing on any single factor like gender or gun control in isolation is too simplistic. Mass shootings have many complex psychological, social and cultural drivers. The article suggests we should resist knee-jerk reactions or assumptions that any one solution will be a panacea. Rather than attacking the author's credibility, I'd encourage you to consider how your input could contribute to a thoughtful discussion about making real progress on this issue. If we want solutions, we need nuance, empathy and an understanding of the multiple perspectives at play here. Dismissing views that don't perfectly align with our own entrenches divisions. I believe if we approach this with open minds and compassion, we are more likely to make headway in preventing these heartbreaking tragedies.